|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- To find reputable sources of information for your research papers
- To avoid being taken in by:
- hoaxes
- scams
- urban legends
- inaccurate, outdated, or questionable information.
|
|
3
|
- Published information is subject to a rigorous review process that is
well established.
- Editors, fact checkers, professional associations, publishers have all
looked at the resource before you ever see it.
|
|
4
|
- Web sites can be thrown up by anyone for any purpose – stated or
unstated.
- There is no review process or body that verifies the accuracy of info or
the credentials of the person(s) involved.
- The Onion
|
|
5
|
- A Search Engine
(Google, Ask.com, etc) ?
or
- A Web or Subject Directory
(LII.org, Open Directory, Infomine)
- Read Things to Know from UC Berkeley Teaching Library
- Use Places to Start from UC Berkeley Teaching Library
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Scan the periphery of the page
- Is there an About Us, Our Mission, or similar link?
- Is there a last updated date on the page?
- Are there links to Publications, Research Library, Reports and Articles,
or the like?
|
|
8
|
- What is it?
- Authority
- Accuracy
- Objectivity
- Currency
- Coverage
- Why is it being critiqued?
- The questions are question-begging!
- Promotes a mechanical as opposed to critical thinking approach
|
|
9
|
- Makes use of information external to the web site.
- Examine the similarities and differences between 2 web pages on the same
topic.
- Corroborate the information – that is, verify it against one or more
different sources.
- This method is described by Marc Meola (2004) in his article “Chucking
the Checklist: A contextual approach to teaching undergraduates web site
evaluation.” portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4 (3): 331-344.
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|